back
- Recognition: I have considered this article above as an ethos declaration: message
- Classification: I think this ethos meets the criteria of Minimal Ethos, but I cannot be sure without further dialogue.
- not challengeable: Brian has answered only once. No reliable way to challenge.
- joinable: image but no list of joiners
- Maybe non-binding: "reject coercion in all of its forms"
- not respectful to other ethoses: does not recognize other ethoses (link to them from the presentation page)
- Dialogue: I have initiated 2-3 threads of dialogue, but they were not continued. Example.
- Integration:
- wrote the detailed page on Empathy to show exactly how my ethos understands this ethos and announced.
- wrote about Ethical Empathy: application of an ethos of empathy to itself (by having empathy with other ethoses).
- Present conclusion: Brian is not serious about abiding by his ethos: he never answered nor acted on this message.
back